Redistricting

Not sure which Ward you currently reside in? Use this map to find out!

Once you've found your ward, use the "Plus" icon to the left to drop a pin and let us know you stopped by.

Option 1 keeps a portion of Downtown areas (based on Downtown Development Authority boundaries) in all wards and has a population deviation of 2%.

In this option, boundaries are distributed based on majority, councilor and a shape that best fits a contiguous compact principle. It also ensures all wards have a portion of Downtown.

Use the "Plus" icon to the left to drop a pin and let us know the things you like and don't like about this option.

Compare Option 1 with Options 2, 3 and 4 →

Pros of Option 1:

• Gives all wards a portion of Downtown/DDA area.
• Provides the most contiguity.
• Positions things so future moves have a more natural progression.
• Moves less people to a new ward when compared to Option 2.

Cons of Option 1:

• Not the most balanced option, but very close.

Option 2 has the most balanced wards but eliminates Downtown areas from Ward 2 and Ward 4 and has a population deviation of 2%.

In this option, boundaries are distributed based on majority, councilor and a shape that best fits a contiguous compact principle. It also provides for balanced wards but eliminates Downtown area for Ward 2 and Ward 4.

Use the "Plus" icon to the left to drop a pin and let us know the things you like and don't like about this option.

Compare Option 2 with Options 1, 3 and 4 →

Pros of Option 2:

• Most balanced option.
• Council noted that keeping Downtown/DDA areas in all Wards did not need to be a consideration.

Cons of Option 2:

• Wards 2 and 4 will not have a portion of downtown/DDA area.
• Lacks some contiguity and stretches Ward 4 towards the southeast.
• Does not represent the natural progression of growth and may require more significant changes for Wards 3 and 4 in the future.

Option 3 was created using feedback from City Council to keep the old Hewlett-Packard neighborhood in its existing ward and has a population deviation of 2%.

In this option, boundaries are distributed based on majority, councilor and a shape that best fits a contiguous compact principle.

Use the "Plus" icon to the left to drop a pin and let us know the things you like and don't like about this option.

Compare Option 3 with Options 1, 2 and 4 →

Pros of Option 3:

• Gives all wards a portion of Downtown/DDA area.
• Provides good contiguity.
• Positions things so future moves have a more natural progression.
• Moves less people to a new ward when compared to all other options.
• Keeps the old Hewlett-Packard neighborhood together in its existing ward.

Cons of Option 3:

• Not the most balanced option; but very close

Option 4 was created to account for growth in Ward 1 and Ward 4 based on current development activity and has a population deviation of 4%.

Use the "Plus" icon to the left to drop a pin and let us know the things you like and don't like about this option.

Compare Option 4 with Options 1, 2 and 3 →

Pros of Option 4:

• Takes into account the growth that will occur in Wards 1 and 4 due to current development activity.
• Helps reduce the need to redistrict earlier than might otherwise be needed.

Cons of Option 4:

• Highest deviation amongst Wards – 4%.
• Moves highest number of people to new Ward – 27.4% disruption rate.

Option 5 was created by Marie Davis-Green with the following information:

All of Garfield Ave. "South" of Hwy #34 should be included with the Downtown District. There is not one option that includes it. This is a main corridor leading into the downtown area with many historic homes that should be included as part of the historic downtown area. Historic homes from 1887, especially the block on Garfield from 10th to 12th street, has always been part of Ward 2 and included as part of the downtown historic district! Some of these homes have a lot of history attached to them.

Use the "Plus" icon to the left to drop a pin and let us know the things you like and don't like about this option.

Looking to create your own map for consideration or just curious to see which Larimer County voter precinct you live in? Check out this map! A few notes:

• The shaded gray areas represent Loveland's City Limits.
• The solid black boundaries represent Larimer County's voter precincts that have been clipped to the bounds of Loveland's City Limits.
• Click on the map to see the population of Loveland residents living within each precinct (slightly adjusted from 2020 U.S. Census data to account for growth) and the corresponding precinct number.
• As some boundaries appear very close, we encourage you to use the zoom in/out function on the map to get a better look.

Download this and other helpful data.

*For ease of representation, please note that Larimer County voter precincts have been clipped to only include areas that overlap with Loveland's City Limits. View complete Larimer County GIS data on their website.